The Voretober Document

Post analysis and reply

This, combined with evidence we will discuss later, gives a hint to the true reason behind all of this ruckus: BigClaudia’s main concern is not to warn the public about a dangerous groomer, but rather to get back at FyreDraygg and Hyperuranium Administration.

Yes, neither does she;
BigClaudia’s stay in Hyperuranium Network was extremely brief (a total of 8 months across two bans); during this stay, she never engaged in any meaningful conversation with any of the Administrators, limiting herself to casual chit-chat and spamming her artwork.
All conversations she had with FyreDraygg, which are no more than five, involve her breaking the Network rules or misbehaving and FyreDraygg having to intervene in an official capacity as Administrator and invariably ending with her being banned or sanctioned.
She thus has absolutely no baseline of a regular, neutral conversation with FyreDraygg.
Furthermore, BigClaudia does not know FyreDraygg personally and is thus not a reliable judge of character about him.
The same applies to all Hyperuranium Administrators.

FyreDraygg, Alita_Berserker and the Hyperuranium accounts had preemptively blocked her as soon as her ban was instated due to her notorious harassing behaviour.
When we ban someone from Hyperuranium it’s because we never want to interact with them anymore.

The only group of Hyperuranium members who might share this vision is also the only group BigClaudia might be interacting with regularly: the banned ones.
BigClaudia also regularly mistakes having an opinion different from her own and backing it up with facts with “forcing it upon her”, which is exactly what she tried to do on Hyperuranium, only to get increasingly violent and rabid the more people don’t let her dictate how they should think.
Further proof of this is provided in the screenshots of her conversations in Addendum 2 and Addendum 3.

FyreDraygg received multiple anonymous tips from members of Hyperuranium warning about BigClaudia’s past misbehaviour and general destructive and litigious nature. When, in order to give her a chance to enter the Hyperuranium Discord, she was made aware of these allegations and cautioned against inciting any kind of argument, she proved unable to understand why an anonymous tip is, in fact, anonymous and still seethes about it.
More on this later.

Rather difficult to make sense of this sentence, but if we understand the general meaning she didn’t in fact guess the correct identity of even one of the anonymous tippers.
The identity of her supposed “tipper” will be discussed later when analyzing another one of her posts.

We would like to provide an actually decent translation; we suggest you double-check every translation she provides since Big Claudia is not well versed in English:

“Greetings. We are not an espionage service. If you wish to be a pain in the ass you can get out immediately, we’ve already shown you the door once, you should know the way.
I’m giving you ONE chance to stay here for artistic reasons, provided you don’t break anyone’s balls.
Using this chance or wasting it depends entirely on how smart you are.”
(break [smn] balls is italian slang for “to harass someone”)

This exchange did actually happen. Again, BigClaudia tried to pry information from Staff regarding the aforementioned anonymous tips, this time in a public chat.
Other than being a blatant violation of Rule 4 (you can refer to Addendum 4: Hyperuranium Vore Club Rules), further aggravating members of Staff who were already tired of her shenanigans, no amount of tantruming would make any Admin budge, much less FyreDraygg.
We currently cannot provide full context for this exchange specifically due to very old age and past clean-up policies for messages violating the rules on public chats.
Keep in mind that, at the time, she had already been banned once and contacted Alita_Berserker privately asking to be readmitted into the Vore Club Group and was eventually let in on promise of good behaviour; Alita_Berserker specifically cautioned her against causing public arguments.

She was not supposed to ask anything at all. Per the rules, she was supposed to be mindful of the warning, not cause any argument and carry along in an orderly fashion.

BigClaudia was kicked from the Discord Server due to causing an argument in Voice Chat which upset multiple users, which will be discussed later.
Regardless of this, the Hyperuranium Discord is a private server and FyreDraygg reserves the right to kick or allow anyone based purely on his decision.
The way BigClaudia devolves into boorish insults and swearing further cements her vulgar and violent personality, possibly giving you even more insight into why we wouldn’t want such a person in our groups and server.

The screenshot depicts a cutout and extremely decontextualized sentence from the Rules post of the International Vore Art Club Group (the Voretober official group, now called Hyperuranium Vore Art Studio. It was integrated into Hyperuranium Network during the Winter 2023 reopening).
At the time of the screenshot the Rules were in the process of being translated from Italian and the sentence shown was an unfortunate effect of having a very inexperienced translator provide a first emergency draft for the time being. The Rules were quickly updated to their final iteration and the corresponding sentence now reads;
“Usage of the group in any way, shape or form akin to a dating site is forbidden.”
The opening statement was also enriched to further explain exactly what was meant: it’s an art help group focusing on constructive criticism and technical aspects of drawing and painting. It isn’t a furmeet chat or an erotic roleplay chat and this should be very clear to prospective users, since multiple such misunderstandings occurred since the group was created.

In any case, despite our first translator’s clear mistake, BigClaudia is definitely the last person on Earth whom we would take English pointers from.

She wouldn’t know not only because she’s never been in this group; she couldn’t be because she’s been pre-emptively banned from it. It’s none of her business anyway.
What even is her argument?

Her thread continues

This is the page she linked in her tweet: https://www.deviantart.com/stash/016vf9r3d40j
Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20250830222330/https://www.deviantart.com/stash/016vf9r3d40j

Yeah no.
A translation is absolutely needed, because the “context” she provides is completely wrong.
Even if we were to ignore how she systematically lies to make herself look better and conveniently leaves out the conclusion of the conversation, even in Italian BigClaudia’s reading comprehension appears to be lacking.
We have a backup of this conversation which will be discussed in Addendum 3 side by side with her screenshot, highlighting the missing messages along with providing a proper translation.

These are the screenshots attached to her following Tweet

We are not in a position to comment about the content of these screenshots; they are cut out from a larger conversation, decontextualized and poorly translated, as usual. If you are interested we encourage you to use external tools to obtain a better translation.

What matters to us is that a conversation about sexually explicit topics between these people at that time should not have occurred, thus we placed Gabriel in a preemptive suspension from Hyperuranium Network.

We would also like to reiterate these points:

• This conversation took place BEFORE either Gabriel or BigClaudia joined Hyperuranium Network and BEFORE any member of our Staff ever met them.
• BigClaudia and Gabriel continued to interact positively in Hyperuranium Network and in private chat during her stay, which took place after this conversation.
• BigClaudia NEVER attempted to communicate with us about this exchange between her and Gabriel, nor she cautioned us about his behaviour.
• It is only much later in time, always related to her slander campaign against “Voretober”, that she mentioned these occurrences.
• It is also of note that, pursuant to Italian Penal Code, posting screenshots of a private chat online with the intent to damage the other person’s reputation is a felony offense.

Due to who the other party is, of the incomplete nature of these screenshots and the high risk of them being manipulated we cannot accept them as definitive proof. While we remain open to further developments, we will suspend judgment on the case until more authoritative evidence can be discovered.
We will obviously not accept anything coming from BigClaudia and her associates as authoritative.

The Moderation, or more accurately the Administration team, cannot act on past events which have not been made public. This post, dated September 30th 2020, is the first time these screenshots ever appeared and it’s more than a year after Big Claudia’s stay on Hyperuranium came to an end.
As such, there is no way the Administration team could have known about this exchange.

The tweet included a screenshot of the FurAffinity page of Hyperuranium Network. We display it here side by side with its current version.

The old FurAffinity page of Hyperuranium Network, accurate about the Staff line-up for the furry section of the Network until 2019.

The current FurAffinity page of Hyperuranium Network, reflecting the current Staff line-up after the Winter 2023 reopening.

Please note that the FurAffinity page is extremely inactive and thus any information it contains at any given time might be very outdated. The most recent update has been performed around May 2024.

As you might notice, the Moderator role has been fully abolished, which might give you an idea of how relevant it ever really was.

Please note this is Big Claudia’s gallery, not Gabriel’s.
We include here the pictures posted (with proper censoring from us for the NSFW part).

The images posted on BigClaudia's FurAffinity gallery.

The comments under the NSFW version of the post.

A major point of suspicion comes from the fact BigClaudia has not removed these pictures from her gallery.
It would stand to reason that a victim of grooming would try to distance themselves from the traumatic event after the realisation;
keeping the pictures in her gallery is not consistent with this assumption.
Different people may react to trauma differently, but considering the totality of the context we feel like her claims are not at all sincere.

BigClaudia turned 18 before joining Hyperuranium Network for the first time and never expressed such sentiment. In fact, she repeatedly publicly sought erotic roleplay both with Gabriel and other users.
Nevertheless, it appears this “realization” came much after her stay on Hyperuranium. Dare we say it occurred to her just about when she was looking for dirt to dig up to slander us?

…but not regretful enough to remove the offending picture from her personal gallery, apparently.

We agree. This is the entire reason why Gabriel is currently suspended indefinitely.
Had this come from a more earnest report and from a more sincere source, he would have been banned a long time ago.

BigClaudia’s date of birth, which can be clearly seen on Deviantart and is corroborated by her Twitter bio and a previous post history, is May 14th 2000.

Link to Big Claudia’s Twitter page: https://x.com/BigClaudiaFairy
Link to Big Claudia’s Twitter post on her birthday: https://x.com/BigClaudiaFairy/status/1657528255862251520
Link to Big Claudia’s DeviantArt page: https://www.deviantart.com/bigclaudia
Archived Version: https://web.archive.org/web/20250801185904/https://www.deviantart.com/bigclaudia
Thus, BigClaudia was 18 years old at the time of joining Hyperuranium Network.
This is based on the extent of information we, as regular people, can access about an individual; we are not government sponsored and we don’t have any kind of resource to perform background checks on new members; we cannot legally ask for a person’s ID over the internet.
Our rules begin with a large disclaimer stating “This group is forbidden to minors.”
This claim is thus baseless.

It would appear that BigClaudia doesn’t understand what the priority is in banning minors from adult groups; the purpose is not to selfishly shield oneself from “legal trouble”, but rather to protect the minors. Again, it would appear reasonable that a real grooming victim would know this and understand it intimately.

This deranged gibberish is completely indecipherable.

Her thread continues

BigClaudia has absolutely zero authority to determine what constitutes a valid or invalid reason for a ban:
the Administration Team is the one who decides such things. In any case, starting fights is definitely a bannable offence.

How convenient.
Since she’s shown to be such a reputable character and so sincere and neutral in this “conversation”, we should probably take her word for it… no?

We are in possession of the full chat log between FyreDraygg and Big Claudia; although we are not allowed by Italian Law to show it publicly, we can summarise it as follows: FyreDraygg never implied Chinese goods to be universally “bad”, he merely advised against trusting cheap clones of name brand keyboards found on eBay. BigClaudia didn’t understand this and somehow interpreted it as a personal attack.
This fits with her usual pattern, as already shown in Addendum 3, of mistaking other people for having an opinion or giving advice with “shoving it down people’s throat”.
This inability to accept the existence of different opinions and points of view from one’s own is childish at best and the violent and rude reactions which follow are unacceptable.

FyreDraygg does own Wacom, Trust, XP-Pen, Microsoft and Huion drawing peripherals.
FyreDraygg consistently expresses a preference towards Huion products and dislike towards Wacom products.
These opinions are always presented with accompanying facts and reasoning and thus never rise to “insulting” any brand.
The kind of flawed logic BigClaudia displays by generalizing her personal experience into a universal statement is probably why she fails to grasp these nuanced ways to approach an argument.

Here BigClaudia goes on a long tirade trying to show her understanding of the intricacies of software-hardware interfacing in drawing peripherals of different brands, providing an example of how she supports her argument in a conversation with gross generalisation of anecdotal evidence and aggressive tone.
More of this in Addendum 3.

We imagine she meant “litigious”. To that we would like to point out that it was in fact BigClaudia who started an argument. You never heard of any arguments from the Voretober accounts, nor from FyreDraygg, Alita_Berserker or any other member of Hyperuranium Staff.
While arguments do occur within Hyperuranium Network, we tend to wash our dirty rags within the confines of our groups, instead of going on temper tantrums on social media or trying to sully someone’s reputation with disgusting lies.

Important information

• A quick glance at TeaTiffs’s Twitter and Big Claudia’s bios, at the time of writing this Document, shows some sort of close relationship between the two, making TeaTiff’s testimony partial due to conflict of interest.
  
  

  Link to Big Claudia’s Twitter Account: https://x.com/BigClaudiaFairy
  Link to TeaTiffs’ Twitter Account: https://x.com/teatiffs

• We never interacted in any way, shape or form with TeaTiffs. They were never part of Hyperuranium or Voretober and never interacted with our community, making what they are reporting here all a result of hearsay or second-hand information. Making an educated guess, these allegations were probably provided by BigClaudia herself.
• Gabriel joined the Telegram Italian Vore group chat of the Hyperuranium Network on January 16th 2018; this happened just after we made The Network open to new users.
• Big Claudia joined the same Italian Vore group on June 12th 2018 at Gabriel’s invite.
• Big Claudia and Gabriel interacted positively during many different occasions in the group throughout a relatively long period of time, sharing their art creations and life experiences, offering mutual help and support.
  Even after they had an argument, during the events of her second ban, they kept in contact. Thus, we had no evidence of any kind to suspect anything inappropriate could have occurred between them.
  We invite you to read Addendum 1, containing some conversations BigClaudia had in our vore group; we will provide our translation for your convenience, but we encourage you to use your own resources to double-check.

Post analysis and reply

This is TeaTiff’s post in question which will now be analyzed part by part.

Here are the pictures included in their first post.
Please note these screenshots are partially different from the ones Big Claudia posted earlier.

We would like to remind you when the conversation in the screenshot allegedly took place Gabriel was not even a member of Hyperuranium Network, let alone one of its Moderators; in fact, Hyperuranium Network wasn’t even publicly open at the time.
Eventual Moderator misconduct outside the Network cannot be known by FyreDraygg or Staff unless reported.
Referring to Gabriel as “One of FyreDraygg’s mods” creates confusion by conflating Hyperuranium and Voretober; greatly overrepresenting Gabriel’s role in the Hyperuranium hierarchy; maliciously linking FyreDraygg’s name to events he was never associated nor involved with.

We totally agree; it is unacceptable to engage or share this kind of content with minors. In case of doubt about the other person’s age, ensuring they are an adult is the first worry a person should have and should make sure of.

This is a malicious lie.
Big Claudia never discussed the matter with Fyre; she couldn’t "approach Fyre about what was happening" because while it was happening Big Claudia had never met Fyre. She wouldn’t interact with Fyre until months later, in June 2018, while the first of these screenshots dates back to December 23rd 2017.
Furthermore, Big Claudia never talked to Fyre about what happened between her and Gabriel during her stay in the Hyperuranium Network. She never talked about that with any of the numerous actual Staff members.
She couldn’t talk to Fyre after her last ban on April 19th 2019 because Fyre blocked her due to her notorious harassing and threatening behaviour online.
This allegation is the main attack directed to FyreDraygg and Hyperuranium Network and is repeated multiple times in different online places in a very inconsistent way: the story changes every time, swapping FyreDraygg with Alita_Berserker or a general “Moderator” or stating they did something different, such as ignoring the report, defending the groomer or “acknowledging” the groomer’s actions. None of these variations, which will be shown later, is even close to being true.
While it is fine to call out the behaviour which allegedly took place in these screenshots, it is unacceptable and disgusting to bring in an innocent third party in an attempt to sully their reputation. This behaviour rises to the level of defamation and carries legal consequences.

FyreDraygg does not have the power to act on past events. It is impossible for Fyre to allow or disallow something that not only happened in the past, but also in a private conversation which he had no part in.
FyreDraygg cannot control the actions of Hyperuranium Moderators; Fyre can remove Moderators and ban users but, for that to happen, he needs to know about the incidents involving them.
As we established, there have been no communications of any kind about what was alleged.

Indeed. This is another reason why FyreDraygg and the whole Hyperuranium Network Staff are very angry about this. Had this been actually reported, an actual intervention could have been applied and they could have protected their community better. Instead, the decision by these individuals to block us, purposefully mangle our Twitter handles so we wouldn’t be notified and talk behind our backs instead of seeking a truthful, open discourse about it allowed the real issue to go unnoticed for years and prevented us from taking the proper, required action.
Now, following Hyperuranium’s reopening in Winter 2023, Staff has been reorganized and Gabriel was already no longer a Moderator.
This agenda to paint FyreDraygg as the problem at all costs instead of the actual person involved has prevented any meaningful resolution to actually happen; since any information coming from Big Claudia and her associates must now be considered by us as fruit of the poisonous tree, we cannot pass any judgment on Gabriel directly due to fear of further manipulation and forging of evidence: if they lie so openly and so naturally about FyreDraygg, what else could they be lying about?
That’ll be for someone else to decide.

In reposting a screenshot of Big Claudia’s long rant thread, TeaTiffs makes an interesting framing choice, choosing to cut the screenshot just before the posts devolve into unhinged and incoherent personal attacks towards FyreDraygg and Hyperuranium over extremely petty issues such as arguments over differing opinions.
While the posts that did make the cut in this screenshot are the only ones directly relevant to the false allegations being reiterated and expanded upon, we feel it is all too convenient, especially since the totality of context provided by the surrounding posts suggests a clear intent to use the alleged grooming incident only as ammo in the slander campaign against FyreDraygg instead of being the actual, genuine report.

First Ban

Sometime after her joining, her behaviour gradually shifted from an energetic and active member of our group into an unpleasant voice of drama and conversation monopoly. Such behaviour escalated into a heated exchange about what, at the time, was a new controversial European Law. This occurred on July 4th, 2018.
We offer you the full conversation from our archives in Addendum 2, including the absolutely necessary context, a proper translation and some missing messages.
As always, we suggest you double-check every translation we provide with your own tools and resources.

Abusive behaviour in voice chat

In March 2019, during a Discord voice chat in the Hyperuranium Network server many users, including BigClaudia, were present in the same voice channel; while most of the participants were playing Minecraft together and discussing the game, BigClaudia decided to start harassing the other users loudly demanding them to move to another voice channel.
Apart from being rude, this behaviour is explicitly prohibited by rules; after many of the users present tried to intervene to de-escalate the situation, receiving only verbal abuse in response, FyreDraygg was forced to act in an official capacity and told BigClaudia to stop immediately or be banned. Only through that threat peace was re-established.

Second Ban

On October 9th, 2018 BigClaudia reached out to us asking to be readmitted in Hyperuranium Network. We decided to give her a second chance; on this occasion she spoke to Alita_Berserker who interceded for her readmission. FyreDraygg, considering her past behaviour, decided as Administrator to caution her to be on her best behaviour after receiving reports of her harassing conduct from other users, whose identity was kept private.
BigClaudia tried to pry on the identity of said users and was immediately shut down by FyreDraygg, whose priority as an Administrator was and still is protecting its members.
In spite of such a great red flag, and in what in hindsight was a mistake, we still decided to admit her back.

She was definitively banned from the Network on April 19th, 2019.
Part of these events has happened in private chats; one of them between her and Gabriel, another between Gabriel and another user.
As we have mentioned at the beginning of this Document, we are not allowed to share content coming from private conversations without both people’s consent; for this reason, we are limited to offering a timeline of events.

• A new user joined the Hyperuranium Vore group.
• Said user shared a private group with only Gabriel and BigClaudia.
• BigClaudia accused Gabriel of using the user list of that private group to invite said new user to Hyperuranium Network.
• BigClaudia’s started causing a scene in public chat about “her users being stolen!”
• BigClaudia was then banned.

At the time we were quite fed up with her behaviour, which had been increasingly disruptive of the group’s atmosphere by interrupting ongoing conversations, oversharing personal drama and tinting every exchange of different opinions with an aura of judgment and conflict, vehemently taking one side when it was not appropriate or even necessary.